
Pakistan’s army chief arrives in Tehran to revive stalled US-Iran talks
Pakistan is trying to keep diplomacy alive without controlling either side.

Pakistan is trying to keep diplomacy alive without controlling either side.
Pakistan’s army chief, Asim Munir, arrived in Tehran on October 20 with a delegation. Islamabad is trying to restart talks between the United States and Iran after regional fighting raised fears that the conflict could spread. A linked an end to the fighting, relief from , less US military activity and safer shipping through the . It later fell apart over security promises and ships’ right to pass. Iran says Hormuz will reopen only if sanctions are eased and regional attacks stop.
Iran said Munir would focus mainly on ties with Pakistan, trade across their border and joint work, while also discussing the wider talks. Pakistan can pass messages and help secure limited deals, but it cannot ease , promise Iran’s safety or make either side compromise. No government confirmed new talks, a deal or a clear result. The visit may keep messages moving without ending the crisis.
Islamabad can pass messages, convene contacts, and use its relationships with both sides to support limited arrangements on trade, de-escalation, and . It lacks the authority to provide Washington’s , guarantee Iran’s security, or compel either government to accept a final agreement.
The visit provided another channel for Pakistan’s , but available reporting did not confirm a new US-Iran agreement or the resumption of negotiations.
Tehran’s official emphasis was on bilateral ties rather than announcing a comprehensive negotiation with Washington. Reports did not establish that the visit produced a nuclear agreement, a , , or new security guarantees.
The delegation was expected to discuss measures affecting trade along the shared border. The visit came as crossings had reportedly been suspended for several days, leaving stranded and adding an immediate bilateral issue to the regional agenda.
Iranian Foreign Ministry spokesman Esmaeil Baqaei said the talks would concern negotiations but would mainly address Pakistan-Iran relations, stronger interaction, and cooperation. Iranian officials also identified and other bilateral matters as subjects for discussion.
Munir arrived in Tehran on October 20 with a delegation of Pakistani officials for discussions with Iranian officials. Iranian statements said the talks focused mainly on bilateral relations and cooperation, while also relating to the .
Pakistan’s army chief became involved in senior contacts with Iranian officials as Islamabad sought to mediate between the United States and Iran and prevent further escalation. Iranian officials said the Tehran discussions focused mainly on and cooperation.
Reports described stalled US-Iran diplomacy over issues including the future of the , while broader terms for resuming negotiations remained unresolved.
Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi said the proposal remained on the table. Tehran continued to demand , an end to regional hostilities, and changes to the before reopening the waterway.
Pakistan and Qatar continued as negotiations remained stalled. Reports of a possible breakthrough indicated active contacts, but no government had confirmed a new agreement or .
The short-lived arrangement failed to produce a durable US-Iran agreement. Political and security disagreements prevented the parties from converting the memorandum into a lasting settlement and shifted Pakistan’s role toward keeping communication alive.
Qatar reported that separate meetings with US and Iranian negotiators, alongside Pakistani mediation, produced positive progress. The discussions concentrated on and for Iran, while harder political issues remained unsettled.
Islamabad maintained its intermediary role after the June framework failed to produce a settlement. Pakistani officials emphasized sustained engagement and continued efforts to bring the two sides back to negotiations.
Iran said its proposal to reopen Hormuz within seven days remained available. Tehran tied implementation to lifting the , easing oil sanctions, and ending hostilities across regional fronts.
The continued negotiations under the Islamabad framework, including arrangements for maritime traffic and financial measures, while broader terms remained unsettled.
Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif said the United States and Iran had agreed on the text of a through Pakistan’s mediation. Reports described provisions concerning an end to hostilities, sanctions, US military activity, and commercial navigation through the Strait of Hormuz.
The framework established a and left longer-term arrangements for commercial navigation through the Strait of Hormuz to subsequent talks, so it was not a fully binding final settlement.
The proposed framework called for Iran to use its best efforts to allow commercial vessels to pass through the Strait for 60 days. It also included discussions on maritime administration, , reconstruction funding, and an end to hostilities in Lebanon.
The conflict and rising US-Iran tensions created pressure for regional diplomatic intervention. Pakistan positioned itself as an intermediary able to communicate with both governments. Islamabad’s effort focused on reducing escalation, restoring negotiations, and addressing the crisis.