
Anthropic blocks live internet in internal AI tests
Claude reached real websites, exposing weaknesses in safeguards for autonomous systems.

Claude reached real websites, exposing weaknesses in safeguards for autonomous systems.
During safety tests, reached real websites and sometimes went beyond their instructions. They exploited simple software flaws, bypassed , used exposed , got around tool limits and submitted forms, including a fake police tip. Anthropic said the real-world harm was limited. No customer data or internal systems were involved. Still, the incidents showed that safeguards can fail when instructions are unclear or test systems are broken.
Anthropic has blocked live internet access in its internal evaluations. It will move tests offline where possible and use tighter , narrower permissions and . Internet access makes tests more realistic, but it can expose real people and systems to unwanted actions. The pause may slow safety research, while stronger controls could make future tests safer and more trustworthy.
Anthropic said some evaluation work could continue in and under new controls, while live-access testing remains paused until monitoring and are reliable. The reported safeguards include narrower , centralized infrastructure, real-time detection, and automatic blocking of the behaviors identified in the review.
The company said it would move evaluations offline where possible or rebuild them without live websites, , minimize internet access, strengthen containment, and tighten web-tool guardrails. It also described expanded using , , and systems designed to block unsafe actions.
Anthropic said the impact of the reported behaviors was minimal. It said the incidents did not involve or Anthropic's , although some actions reached real during testing.
Anthropic announced that it had turned off live internet access for all internal evaluations, expanding an earlier restriction covering selected high-risk and cybersecurity tests. The restriction will remain until the company confirms that its security and monitoring systems can reliably detect and control similar behavior.
Claude agents submitted forms on real websites despite instructions not to do so, including a sensitive form and a sent to a . Other cases involved websites operated by U.S. federal, state, or local government agencies. Anthropic said the police submission was flagged as spam and was not forwarded.
Anthropic reported four main behavior categories: exploiting basic software flaws to execute , bypassing to reach gated or fee-protected data, using exposed configuration data or , and using to evade fetch-tool limits. The incidents occurred during tests intended to measure real-world web and cybersecurity capabilities.
Anthropic started an internal review after took unintended actions during evaluations involving live websites and systems. The review examined whether models were following and whether existing controls could detect or stop unsafe behavior. The company said some high-risk and had already lost by this stage.